Addepar alternative

Everything in one system 

Addepar vs FundCount at a glance

Addepar

Fundcount

Role in your technology stack

Aggregates data for reporting; books remain in separate GL/partnership tools.
One system for books + analysis—no separate accounting stack needed.

Transaction engine
and real-time ledger

No auto journals; export to Excel/GL to post and reconcile.
Transactions post once to multi-currency GL; NAV/financials update in real time.

Partnership and capital accounting

Partnership workflows run in Excel or another system.
Native capital calls, allocations, waterfalls; capital accounts produced automatically.

Alternatives and complex assets

Alternatives need workarounds; limited basis/tax detail.
Handles hedge funds, private equity, real estate, and direct deals in the same ledger as listed securities.

Multi-entity, multi-currency consolidation

Models entities, but consolidation lives outside the reporting layer.
Real-time consolidation across entities, currencies, and asset types.

Tax reporting and audit trail

Tax schedules/K-1 work happens in other tools; audit trail fragments.
1065/K-1 mapping with drill-back from forms to transactions.

Spreadsheet and reconciliation burden

Excel persists for waterfalls, capital tracking, and cross-system reconciliations.
Unified ledger and integrated data feeds reduce spreadsheet dependence. Custodian, bank, and fund administrator data, plus AI-extracted alternative investment data, flow into a single multi-currency ledger that drives both accounting and analytics. 

Best fit

RIAs/wealth managers with existing accounting stack needing better reporting.
Family offices and fund managers wanting accounting + reporting in one.

Compare your current stack

Why family offices choose FundCount

Single system for accounting and reporting

Runs portfolio, partnership, and accounting in one place, so financials, capital accounts, and client reports already match.

Clean entity and ownership view

Built for complex, nested entities and ownership structures, so you can see how everything connects without rebuilding it in spreadsheets.

Multi asset class strength


Handles public markets, hedge funds, private equity, real estate, and direct deals in one ledger, instead of splitting alternatives into side models.

No spreadsheets

Moves key workflows like capital calls, allocations, and consolidations out of Excel, cutting duplicate data entry and manual fixes.

Tax and audit ready

Daily work rolls up into tax schedules and audit-ready reports with drill-down to transactions and source documents when questions come up.

Data backbone for analytics

Gives you a single, trusted data source for BI and dashboards, instead of stitching together exports from multiple systems.

Replace Addepar with FundCount

What you get with FundCount

Instead of a reporting tool...

…glued onto other systems, you get a transaction-based general ledger that keeps every position, entity, and investor in one place.

Trades, capital calls, distributions, and fees hit the books once and flow straight into the right statements, so the portfolio view, the capital accounts, and the financials all tell the same story.

Most teams come to FundCount...

…to get away from exports, copy and paste, and late-night reconciliations. One system for multi asset class and multi entity accounting lets them see where cash sits, who owns what through which structure, and how returns flow to each family member without rebuilding the picture in spreadsheets.



Because everything lives in a single ledger, dashboards, analytics, and tax work all pull from the same clean data, which means fewer moving pieces and numbers everyone can trust when they sit down with the family.

FAQ

No. It was built for complex structures, but many single and multi-family offices start with a smaller number of entities and grow into the system. What matters most is that you want proper books, clear ownership, and to move away from spreadsheet workarounds.

Implementation is structured as a project, but it does not have to be a “rip and replace” event. Most firms start with a subset of entities and asset classes, validate results against their current setup, and then roll in the rest once they are comfortable.

Yes. Many clients keep their current CRM, document management, and BI tools. FundCount becomes the system of record for accounting data and then feeds the tools you already use for relationships, documents, and dashboards.

You do not need an in-house development team. You need people who understand your entities, accounts, and investment activity. Once the structure and workflows are set up, daily work looks like posting activity, reviewing reports, and handling exceptions, not constant system tweaking.

You can. Some firms start by bringing in private equity, hedge funds, or real estate first, because those are the hardest to track in spreadsheets. Once that piece runs smoothly, they add listed securities and the rest of the structure.

Most prospects walk through their actual entities and holdings with the FundCount team and map out how they would be modeled before making a decision. Seeing your own structure laid out in the system is usually the quickest way to know if it fits.

Request a Live Demo

See FundCount’s integrated accounting and reporting solution in action!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.