Family office reporting software helps family offices and UHNW families consolidate wealth data across entities, accounts, and asset types, then deliver clear reporting to stakeholders. 

This guide ranks five widely used options to consider, plus a checklist and demo questions so you can shortlist faster.

Key Takeaways

Best for X summaries

Direct answer: what is the best family office reporting software?

The best family office reporting software depends on your operating model. 

FundCount is a strong fit if you want reporting anchored to a real-time general ledger and accounting workflow.

Landytech is a strong pick if you want a dedicated consolidation and analytics layer with data aggregated from hundreds of custodians. 

Asora fits teams that want a single operating platform for data aggregation, reporting, and private asset oversight. 

Addepar fits teams that want centralized portfolio information, analysis, and customizable reporting for complex structures. 

BlackRock Aladdin Wealth fits wealth organizations that want a broader wealth management platform with whole-portfolio support and integrations across their ecosystem.

Quick comparison table

Software	Best for	Standout strengths	Watch-outs	Implementation effort	Ideal complexity
FundCount	Accounting-backed reporting	Real-time GL, portfolio + partnership accounting, secure portal delivery	Heavier implementation than reporting-only tools	Medium to High	Complex entities
Landytech (Sesame One)	Consolidated reporting and analytics layer	Custodian aggregation, report automation, dashboards and workflows	Requires clean mapping and governance for “single source of truth”	Medium	Moderate to Complex
FundCount	Modern family office operations	Data aggregation, private assets + docs, workflows and mobile	Validate coverage for your banks, custodians, and private asset workflows	Medium to High	Complex entities
Addepar	Portfolio reporting and analysis	Centralized data, complex ownership and multi-currency analysis, customizable reports	Often needs a separate accounting system for accounting-led statements	Medium	Moderate to Complex
BlackRock Aladdin Wealth	Enterprise wealth platform	Whole portfolio approach across asset classes, business insights and oversight, integrations	May be more platform than a typical family office needs	High	Complex at scale

The capabilities summarized above are drawn from vendor documentation and product pages for each platform.

How we evaluated these tools

This is a consideration-stage shortlist, not an exhaustive market map. Our goal is to help you pick the right category of solution and ask better demo questions.

Scoring rubric (how to compare options consistently)

We used a rubric that mirrors what consolidated reporting providers are expected to deliver: a reliable automated data stream, analytics for decision-making, dashboards across devices, and custom reporting flexibility.

Suggested weights you can reuse:

• Consolidation and entity modeling: 20%
• Data aggregation and feed quality: 20%
• Private assets and alternatives handling: 15%
• Reporting flexibility and outputs: 15%
• Portals, permissions, and sharing: 10%
• Audit trail, controls, and security posture: 10%
• Integrations and ecosystem fit: 5%
• Implementation burden and support: 5%

Sources used

• Vendor documentation and product pages (primary sources)
• Industry context on consolidated reporting needs and key considerations for family offices

What to look for in family office reporting software

Citi Private Bank highlights that consolidated reporting is crucial, but complicated by disparate data sources and formats, and it emphasizes the need for reliable automated data streams, analytics, dashboards across platforms, and custom reporting. Use this checklist to avoid costly mismatches during selection:

Entity and ownership hierarchy

• Support for multi-entity and multi-generation structures (trusts, holding companies, SPVs)
• “Look-through” views from entity to consolidated portfolio

Data aggregation

• Connectivity to your banks, custodians, and institutions
• Normalization rules, mapping control, and change logs

Alternatives and private assets

• Commitments, capital calls, distributions, and valuation history
• Document workflows so PDFs and notices are linked to the right investment

Reporting and report packs

• Consolidated performance and exposure reporting
• Flexible report formats (PDF, Excel) and scheduling
• Approval workflows for distribution where needed

Portal, permissions, and security

• Role-based permissions for family members, advisors, and staff
• MFA and encryption, plus audit trail expectations

Integration fit

• CRM, planning, OMS, BI tools, and accounting integrations
• Whether the software is meant to be your “system of record” or a reporting layer

The 5 best family office reporting software solutions

FundCount

Best for: Family offices that want accounting-backed reporting anchored to a real-time general ledger, plus secure report distribution through a portal.

Why it is a top pick

• FundCount positions its family office solution around consolidating portfolio and partnership accounting activity through a real-time general ledger for investment analysis and reporting.
• The general ledger is described as multi-currency and multi-book, supporting IFRS and GAAP, and designed to consolidate financials across entities (income statements, balance sheets, NAV reports).
• FundCount’s investor portal sits inside the FundCount ecosystem, with data flowing from the accounting engine without manual re-keying, plus bulk personalized statement generation via an “Advanced Report Set.”
• Reporting emphasizes interactive reports and distribution through email or the secure portal, with encryption and layered approvals.
• Data aggregation is positioned around feeds from custodians and data providers, with automated double-entry accounting to speed reporting.

Reporting strengths

• Entity-level and consolidated financial reporting supported by the real-time GL (income statements, balance sheets, NAV reports).
• Customizable report templates and an “encyclopedia” of reports, plus sharing through email or portal workflows.
• Integrated distribution and investor access, including publishing documents and statements from the reporting workflow.

Data coverage

• Portfolio accounting supports complex investments including derivatives, private equity, real estate, and debt instruments.
• Data aggregation uses feeds from custodians and data providers, and emphasizes automated double-entry accounting and control over mappings.
• Portfolio accounting notes direct connections to custodians and market data feeds.

Portal and sharing

• Investor portal is described as protected by encryption and MFA, with single-tenant deployment options (private cloud or on-prem) and optional approval workflow for compliance sign-off.
• Bulk statement delivery and structured-data sharing are highlighted for distribution efficiency.

Pros

• Strong fit when “reporting” includes accounting-led statements, close processes, and entity financials, not just performance dashboards.
• Integrated stack across GL, portfolio accounting, reporting, and portal reduces system handoffs.
• Clear security posture for portal access, including encryption and MFA.

Cons

• Heavier initial setup than reporting-only tools because you are implementing an accounting and reporting core.
• You will need clear definitions for entity structures, reporting packs, and mapping rules to realize the consolidation benefits.

Implementation notes

• Start with an entity map (trusts, holding companies, SPVs), chart of accounts requirements, and reporting pack requirements, then build the data mappings and consolidation logic.
• Decide early who owns data mappings and source control, since FundCount emphasizes control over mappings and source data.
• Design portal permissions and approval workflows before launch to avoid manual distribution and version confusion.

Questions to ask during the demo

• How do you model nested entities and automate reconciliation across those entities (including look-through reporting)?
• Which financial reports are available out of the box (income statement, balance sheet, NAV) and how are they generated in real time?
• How does your data aggregation handle custodian feeds, mapping control, and change management over time?
• How do report packs get approved and distributed, and what encryption and MFA controls apply to portal delivery?
• Can the investor portal deliver both PDFs and structured data (for dashboards or exports), and what does bulk statement delivery look like?
• What deployment options are supported (private cloud, on-prem), and how does single-tenant deployment affect data access?
• What is the recommended rollout sequence for a family office that needs both accounting-backed reporting and consolidated investment reporting?

Landytech

Best for: Family offices that want a consolidated reporting and analytics layer focused on data aggregation, dashboards, and report automation.

Why it is a top pick

• Landytech positions Sesame One as a platform for family offices with multi-asset portfolios to resolve data aggregation, analytics, and reporting challenges.
• It highlights receiving clean and standardized data from 500+ custodians and using analytics to fuel dashboards, reporting, and portals.
• It emphasizes a complete view of a multi-asset portfolio in a live dashboard, with insights into performance, exposure, liquidity, risk, and forecasts.
• It highlights centralizing tasks, notes, and documents, plus notifications and a mobile app for monitoring portfolio developments.
• Its consolidated reporting page describes a report library, scheduling, approval workflows, and document management supporting audit trail and history.

Reporting strengths

• Automated report production and scheduling, including consolidated performance reports, cash reporting, and fee analytics.
• Report builder for bespoke reporting at scale, plus output formats like PDF and Excel and approval workflows for distribution.
• Central “golden source” positioning, where validated and enriched data supports reporting consistency.

Pros

• Strong fit if your core problem is consolidation, reporting efficiency, and standardized data feeding reports and portals.
• Clear emphasis on report automation, scheduling, and approval workflows, which helps operational cadence.
• Workflow and monitoring features (tasks, documents, notifications, mobile) support ongoing reporting operations.

Cons

• Like any consolidation layer, it still depends on clean mappings, consistent entity structures, and governance for data definitions to keep the “single source of truth” reliable.
• If you need accounting-led financial statements, you may still need an accounting core alongside the reporting platform.

Implementation notes

• Build an entity and account mapping plan first, and define required report packs and frequency before turning on automated scheduling.
• Decide what constitutes “validated and enriched” data for your office, especially for alternatives.
• Define permissions and document retention expectations for audit trail and report history.

Questions to ask during the demo

• Which custodians and banks do you support for our exact footprint, and what does “clean and standardized data” mean in practice?
• How do you model multi-entity ownership, and how do you validate entity-level consolidation before reporting goes live?
• What is the workflow for alternative asset updates, including document ingestion and valuation changes?
• How do report scheduling and approvals work, and can we enforce an approval step before distribution?
• What audit trail is available for report versions and changes to underlying data?
• Can your analytics feed our existing portal, BI layer, or downstream systems through APIs or integrations?
• What is the best way to handle ad hoc reporting requests without breaking standardized reporting packs?

Asora

Best for: Family offices that want a single operating platform for data aggregation, portfolio management, reporting, and private asset oversight, with modern workflows and security controls.

Why it is a top pick

• Asora describes itself as a family office operating platform that centralizes data aggregation, portfolio management, and reporting, built as a single source of truth for assets, entities, and accounts.
• It emphasizes automated data aggregation from banks and custodians and “on-demand reports ready in minutes.”
• It explicitly states it supports complex ownership structures and consolidation across structures.
• Asora highlights security posture, including private cloud deployment options, a security and compliance center, and ISO 27001 certification.
• Its private assets feature highlights structured tracking of valuations, transactions, commitments, capital calls, and distributions, plus documents linked to assets.

Data coverage

• Asora states it can connect bank, investment, and custody accounts, and track liquid and illiquid assets, including private equity, real estate, direct investments, venture holdings, and alternatives.
• Private assets feature supports valuation tracking over time and custom fields to match your office’s data model.
• Asora notes it supports integrations with thousands of global financial institutions and references Canoe Intelligence for private asset tracking (confirm fit in your demo).

Pros

• Strong fit if you want a modern operating system feel, with data aggregation, reporting, workflows, documents, and mobile access as first-class features.
• Clear support for private asset tracking workflows, which is a key pain point in family office reporting.
• Security posture is communicated clearly (ISO 27001, compliance center, private cloud option).

Cons

• Validate the depth of your required reporting packs (for example, beneficiary-level packs, look-through across complex trusts, or custom fee reporting) during the demo.
• Confirm how private asset statements and notices are ingested and how exceptions are handled during quarter-end cycles.

Implementation notes

• Define your entity structure, reporting packs, and private asset taxonomy before data migration.
• Decide which banks and custodians will be connected via automated aggregation and which will be handled via file ingestion.
• Set permission roles for family members, advisors, and staff early, especially for document access.

Questions to ask during the demo

• How do you model complex ownership structures (trusts, holding entities, beneficiaries) and consolidate views at multiple levels?
• Which banks, custodians, and institutions can you connect for our footprint, and what is the fallback when feeds fail?
• How do you track private assets, including commitments, capital calls, distributions, and valuation history, and how does that roll into consolidated reporting?
• What document workflows exist for drawdown notices, valuation statements, and capital call notices, and how are permissions managed?
• What security controls are available (ISO 27001, encryption, private cloud), and what audit trail exists for access and data changes?
• How do you handle performance reporting for alternatives, including IRR and MOIC, and how customizable are those calculations?
• What does implementation look like, and what data do we need to prepare to reach “single source of truth” quickly?

Addepar

Best for: Family offices and wealth teams that want centralized portfolio data, analysis, and customizable reporting across complex ownership structures, asset classes, and currencies.

Why it is a top pick

• Addepar’s family office page emphasizes centralizing financial information in a single place, with a complete view of accounts and assets across asset classes, legal entities, and currencies.
• It highlights analyzing and visualizing portfolio data, including complex ownership structures and multi-currency scenarios, with analysis down to transaction-level detail.
• Addepar’s sample reports resource highlights customizable portfolio reporting, the ability to create and edit custom reports, aggregate portfolio data for any asset class or currency, and visualize portfolios.

Reporting strengths

• Custom report building and editing, with multi-asset and multi-currency aggregation.
• Analysis and visualization designed to support exposure and risk understanding, tied to complex ownership structures.
• Sample report resources include templates for single and multi-family office quarterly investment reporting.

Portal and sharing

• Addepar emphasizes security and data protection, stating confidentiality and integrity of data are top priorities, and describing a multifaceted security program.
• Validate portal experiences, permission granularity, and stakeholder delivery workflows during demo, since family office reporting often requires different views for different family members and advisors.

Pros

• Strong fit for complex portfolio reporting and analysis across ownership structures and currencies.
• Clear emphasis on customizable reporting and fast analysis from summary to transaction-level detail.
• Useful when you need a consolidated investment reporting layer that can coexist with other systems.

Cons

• Family offices that need accounting-led financial statements often still use a dedicated accounting system alongside an investment reporting platform.
• Validate how fee analytics, document workflows, and alternatives reporting are handled, especially if your portfolio is heavy in private assets.

Implementation notes

• Start with a clear entity structure and currency treatment, then define the standard quarterly report pack and the “ad hoc” request workflow.
• Plan a data validation phase: a consolidated reporting system is only trusted when numbers match source statements.
• Document calculation assumptions (performance methodology, benchmarks, fee handling) so reports are consistent across time.

Questions to ask during the demo

• How do you model complex ownership structures and legal entities, and how is look-through reporting handled?
• What does “complete view of all accounts and assets” mean for our exact asset mix, including private investments?
• How do you handle multi-currency reporting, including base currency vs translated views at the entity and consolidated level?
• How are custom reports built, versioned, and distributed, and can we standardize quarterly packs while allowing ad hoc views?
• What is the reconciliation workflow against custodian statements and private asset valuations, and what audit trail exists for changes?
• What portal and permissioning options exist for family members vs advisors vs internal staff?
• Which integrations are available if we also run an accounting system (for example, for financial statements and close workflows)?

BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Best for: Wealth organizations serving UHNW clients that need an enterprise platform supporting a whole-portfolio approach across asset classes, plus integrations into a broader wealth tech ecosystem.

Why it is a top pick

• BlackRock describes Aladdin Wealth as an investment management platform designed to help wealth managers accelerate growth, drive advisor efficiency, and personalize client portfolios.
• It states Aladdin Wealth serves wealth managers and advisors globally, including private banks and other wealth segments, and supports client segments up to ultra-high net worth.
• It positions a whole-portfolio approach across asset classes including alternatives, plus other categories like fixed income, equities, options, structured products, annuities, and insurance.
• BlackRock’s broader Aladdin platform is described as unifying investment management through a common data language, with whole-portfolio views across public and private markets.
• Integration is emphasized, including connecting with systems like CRM, financial planning, and OMS to enhance the advisor experience.

Reporting strengths

• Aladdin Wealth highlights capabilities for business oversight and management, plus advisor portfolio management and rebalancing.
• The Aladdin platform highlights configurable dashboards, modeling, and analytics for faster insights and capacity to scale.

Data coverage

• Whole-portfolio positioning across public and private markets is a core theme of Aladdin.
• Aladdin Wealth lists asset class support including alternatives.
• Validate data aggregation specifics for your custodian footprint and private assets approach during the demo, since enterprise platforms often vary by deployment and integration choices.

Portal and sharing

• Aladdin Wealth emphasizes connected digital systems across roles from CIO office to advisors and end customers, and integration into the broader ecosystem is positioned as a key capability.
• Confirm exactly what “end customer” views look like in your use case, and whether you need a separate portal experience for family members.

Pros

• Strong fit for organizations that want an enterprise wealth platform, especially where reporting is tied to oversight, personalization, and scaled portfolio management.
• Whole-portfolio approach across asset classes and across public and private markets is a consistent platform narrative.
• Integration posture is explicit, including connecting with CRM, planning, and OMS systems.

Cons

• Likely more platform than many single-family offices need, especially if your goal is primarily consolidated reporting rather than enterprise wealth operations.
• Implementation complexity can be higher due to integration choices and enterprise governance requirements.

Implementation notes

• Define whether you are adopting Aladdin Wealth as a core platform or integrating it into an existing ecosystem of CRM, planning, OMS, and accounting.
• Align stakeholders on the operating model first (central office oversight vs advisor workflows vs end-customer experience).
• Validate security, data residency, and audit trail requirements early, since privacy and cybersecurity are critical for family office style reporting.

Questions to ask during the demo

• Who is Aladdin Wealth designed to serve in practice, and how does the experience differ for UHNW clients vs institutional segments?
• What does “whole portfolio approach” mean for our asset mix, especially alternatives and private markets exposure?
• Which integrations are standard for CRM, financial planning, and OMS, and what is required to connect our existing stack?
• How do reporting and dashboards work, and can we create standardized quarterly report packs plus ad hoc reporting views?
• What is the audit trail for data changes and reporting outputs, and how are approvals handled?
• What end-customer or client portal experiences are available, and how granular are permissions?
• What is the typical implementation path, and what internal resources are required on our side?

Feature matrix (quick scan)

Use this as a fast way to align tools to needs. Confirm specifics in demo.

Need	FundCount	Landytech	Asora	Addepar	BlackRock Aladdin Wealth
Accounting-backed reporting (GL-led)	Strong	Pair with the accounting core	Partial accounting oversight	Typically pairs with accounting core	Platform-dependent
Custodian aggregation focus	Yes	Strong emphasis	Yes	Yes	Ecosystem-dependent
Private assets tracking and docs	Yes, plus accounting context	Available, validate workflows	Strong emphasis	Available, validate depth	Available, validate depth
Report packs and scheduling	Yes	Strong emphasis	Yes	Yes	Yes
Portal-style delivery	Investor portal + MFA	Feeds portals, validate	Secure sharing, validate	Validate portal	Ecosystem and integration

This matrix reflects vendor positioning and published capabilities, and should be validated during demos for your exact footprint.

How to choose the right option

Use these decision paths to shortlist quickly.

If you need accounting-led statements and entity financials

Start with FundCount, because it centers reporting on a real-time general ledger, consolidation across entities, and integrated distribution workflows.

If you need a consolidated reporting layer and standardized analytics

Start with Landytech if your primary pain is data consolidation and report automation, especially where custodian aggregation and scheduled report packs matter.

If you need private assets tracking plus modern workflows

Start with Asora, especially if private investments, documentation, and workflow management are central.

If you need customizable portfolio reporting and analysis

Start with Addepar for centralized portfolio information, complex ownership structures, and multi-currency reporting.

If you are running an enterprise wealth platform

Consider BlackRock Aladdin Wealth if you need an enterprise platform for wealth operations, personalization, and integrations across CRM, planning, and OMS.

Implementation checklist

Consolidated reporting fails more often due to process gaps than tool gaps. Citi Private Bank highlights that consolidation is challenging when data is disparate across providers and formats, so plan for data compatibility and process control.

FAQ

What is family office reporting software?

Family office reporting software consolidates wealth data across entities, accounts, and asset classes and turns it into standardized reporting for monitoring and decision-making. Citi Private Bank notes consolidated reporting is crucial for monitoring and timely feedback, and that timeliness depends on data accessibility across entities like banks, asset managers, and private companies.

Can these tools track private equity, real estate, and other alternatives?

Many can, but depth varies. Asora’s private assets feature explicitly covers private investment tracking such as commitments, capital calls, distributions, valuation history, and document attachment. FundCount and other platforms also describe support for alternative assets, but you should confirm valuation workflows and reconciliation in demos.

What is look-through reporting, and do I need it?

Look-through reporting means seeing exposures and performance from underlying holdings through multiple entity layers. It matters when assets are held across trusts, holding companies, and vehicles. Citi highlights the importance of consolidation across entities and formats and the need for reliable, automated data streams and dashboards across platforms.

Do I need a separate accounting system, or can reporting software replace accounting?

Often, reporting tools focus on aggregation, analytics, and presentation, while accounting systems handle the general ledger, close process, and financial statements. FundCount emphasizes a real-time general ledger supporting consolidated financials and reports, which is closer to an accounting-backed approach than reporting-only layers.

How do portals and permissions usually work?

Portals typically provide controlled access so different stakeholders see different report packs and dashboards, often supported by MFA and encryption. FundCount’s portal highlights encryption and MFA, plus single-tenant deployment options. Asora highlights a security and compliance center and ISO 27001 certification.

How long does implementation take?

Timelines vary based on data complexity and entity structure. The biggest drivers are data compatibility, mapping, and validation across disparate formats, which Citi notes is a core industry challenge. Plan time for mapping, reconciliation, and a parallel reporting period before stakeholders rely on the new system.

What should I ask during a demo?

Ask about entity modeling, private assets handling, data aggregation and normalization, reconciliation workflows, audit trail, report pack scheduling, permissions, and integrations. Citi’s recommended attributes include a reliable automated data stream, analytics for decision-making, dashboards across platforms, and custom reporting.

How do I ensure data accuracy across custodians?

Insist on a documented reconciliation process, clear mapping of ownership, and an audit trail for changes. Citi notes that the inconsistency of formats and data fields across providers makes consolidation laborious, so your provider’s data compatibility and validation approach matters as much as its dashboards.

Sources and update policy

Sources used: Vendor documentation and product pages for FundCount, Landytech, Asora, Addepar, and BlackRock Aladdin Wealth, plus an industry reference on consolidated reporting needs for family offices from Citi Private Bank.