Portfolio reporting software helps investment teams turn portfolio data into investor- or client-ready outputs. That can mean quarterly LP reports and capital account statements for private funds, or performance reports and a client portal for RIAs, family offices, and wealth managers.

The best portfolio reporting software depends on what you must publish and how tightly it needs to tie back to the accounting source of truth. Some platforms focus on accounting-backed statements and secure distribution. Others focus on performance dashboards, PDF report builders, and portals for ongoing client communication.

Key takeaways

Best for X (quick shortlist)

Quick comparison table: portfolio reporting software (2026)

Platform	Best for	What it’s strongest at	Reporting depth*	Portal / sharing
FundCount	Accounting-backed reporting	Statements and reporting tied to the accounting engine, portal publishing, approvals, and encryption	High	Investor portal + controlled distribution
Carta	Private fund reporting + LP portal	Investor reporting components and LP Portal access to documents, performance views, K-1s	Medium	LP Portal
Rundit	VC/PE LP reporting	Interactive LP reports, dashboards, Excel/PDF exports, ILPA/Invest Europe aligned reporting positioning	Medium	Shareable dashboards (including no-login sharing, vendor-stated)
Envestnet	Advisor and wealth reporting	Reporting on holdings, transactions, account performance, allocation, flows, dashboard views	Medium to High	Portal experience varies by configuration and products
Orion Advisor Tech	Advisor performance reporting	Custom performance reporting and an advisor-to-client reporting experience	Medium	Orion Client Portal
Addepar	Aggregation + custom reporting	Drag-and-drop reporting customization and repeatable PDF generation at scale	High	Client Portal workflows (including API publishing)
SS&C Black Diamond	Client-ready reporting + portal	Branded reporting with report builder tooling and a client experience portal	High	Client Experience Portal

*Reporting depth is an editorial shorthand for how robust the platform is for producing, governing, and delivering portfolio reporting outputs (templates, workflows, auditability, portal distribution). It is not a technical certification.

What is portfolio reporting software?

Portfolio reporting software turns portfolio data into repeatable outputs. The outputs vary by audience:

In other words, “portfolio reporting software” is a category label, but buyers should define it by workflow: where data comes from, how it is validated, how reports are produced, and how they are delivered.

Why it matters in 2026

Reporting has shifted from a periodic task to a core part of investor and client experience. For private funds, investor reporting is positioned as a cornerstone of investor relations and confidence, and the content itself is increasingly standardized around metrics and clarity.

For wealth and advisors, reporting must be consistent, explainable, and presentable. Platforms like SS&C Black Diamond explicitly emphasize “client-ready reporting” and “branded” materials, while advisor platforms like Envestnet and Orion emphasize ongoing performance reporting for clients.

Operationally, the biggest gains come from removing manual steps:

• fewer spreadsheet consolidations
• fewer “which PDF is final” problems
• cleaner portals and controlled publishing
• faster production of recurring packs (monthly or quarterly), in bulk

Must-have features checklist for portfolio reporting software

Use this checklist to evaluate every vendor in demos.

1) Data collection and normalization

• Clear data intake model (imports, templates, custodian feeds, APIs)
• Ability to handle both liquid holdings and alternatives where required
• Validations and exception workflows (what happens when data is missing or inconsistent)

2) Performance measurement and calculations

• Transparent performance calculations (time-weighted vs money-weighted, net vs gross, fee handling)
• Ability to report what your stakeholders ask for (private funds may need DPI/RVPI/net IRR, advisors often need account performance and allocation views)
• Auditability of calculation assumptions (especially if outputs are regulated or audited)

3) Reporting outputs and templates

• A practical report builder (custom templates, reusable blocks, branding)
• Batch generation for many portfolios/clients at once (monthly/quarterly)
• Multiple formats (PDF, Excel, interactive dashboards)

4) Portal and delivery workflow

• Secure portal access, permissions, and version control
• Publishing workflow (draft vs publish, approvals, notifications)
• Secure distribution controls (encryption, MFA where relevant)

5) Governance and audit trail

• Role-based permissions and activity logs
• Version history for corrected reports
• Approvals and period controls if reporting is tied to accounting close

6) Integrations and extensibility

• Custodians and data feeds (if you rely on them)
• Accounting and general ledger handoffs (if you need books-to-reporting traceability)
• API support for automation and data movement

Top 7 portfolio reporting software options (ranked)

FundCount

Quick verdict: FundCount is a strong fit when an accounting system of record is required for portfolio reporting. It emphasizes interactive reporting, adaptable templates, and controlled distribution through a secure investor portal, including bulk personalized statement publishing via an “Advanced Report Set.”

Best for

• Funds, administrators, and family offices that want reporting connected to a real-time general ledger and portfolio accounting workflows.
• Teams that want to publish statements and reports through a portal with approvals and security controls, instead of manually emailing documents.

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• Reporting solution emphasizes interactive online reporting, email sharing, and secure sharing through the FundCount Investor Portal, with encryption and layered approvals.
• Investor portal positioning: portal sits inside the ecosystem, so data flows from the accounting engine to investors without manual re-keying.
• Advanced Report Set positioning: create personalized statements in bulk and push structured performance data that refreshes dashboards.
• Real-time general ledger positioning includes multi-currency and multi-book support for IFRS and GAAP reporting.
• Portfolio accounting positioning includes performance and risk reporting, benchmark comparisons, and performance attribution analysis.
• Data aggregation and custodian feed positioning: use feeds from custodians and data providers to streamline data management and reduce reconciliation errors.

Pros

• Strong “books-to-reporting” operating model when auditability and tie-outs matter.
• Portal publishing and bulk statement workflows reduce manual distribution overhead in recurring cycles.

Cons

• If your reporting needs are purely marketing-style dashboards with lightweight data governance, an analytics-first tool may feel faster to deploy.
• As with any accounting-backed workflow, implementation outcomes depend on data definitions, template governance, and internal ownership.

Integrations to verify

• Custodian/data provider feed coverage and exception handling.
• Whether your preferred delivery workflow is portal-first, email-first, or hybrid, and how approvals and versioning work.

Pricing

• Typically quote-based, depending on modules and implementation scope.

Questions to ask during the demo

• Show the end-to-end reporting cycle: data ingestion, reconciliations, report generation, approvals, and portal publishing.
• Demonstrate bulk personalized statement publishing using the Advanced Report Set, including how templates are governed across clients/funds.
• Pick one report number and trace it back to source data and the general ledger, including audit trail.
• Show how permissions work for different investors or stakeholders and how you prevent “wrong audience, wrong report” mistakes.

Carta

Quick verdict: Carta is often shortlisted for private fund workflows where investor reporting is part of the broader fund administration and LP experience. Carta’s positioning emphasizes the LP Portal and a streamlined investor experience, including digital access to reporting and K-1s.

Best for

• Private fund GPs that want investor reporting packaged with fund administration workflows and an LP Portal.
• Teams that want clear guidance on what to include in investor reports and standardized metrics (like DPI, RVPI, net IRR) in reporting narratives.

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• GP solution page describes LP Portal access where LPs can sign subscription documents, view performance, access vetted reports, and receive K-1s and distributions.
• Investor reporting guidance describes investor reporting as a core IR function and outlines common performance metrics and report components.
• Support documentation shows report and document access patterns, including items like schedule of investments and exporting investment information (useful when validating “reporting reality”).

Pros

• Strong LP portal experience for document access and communications in a private fund context.
• Useful for firms that want reporting to be part of a broader operational platform rather than a separate report builder.

Cons

• Validate where “source of truth” lives for accounting-backed numbers. Depending on your setup, you may still need a separate accounting/reporting system for strict tie-outs and audit workflows.

Integrations to verify

• How reporting artifacts and metrics reconcile to your accounting close process and how corrections are versioned and communicated.
• How your existing CRM or investor communications tools fit with the LP Portal operating model.

Pricing

• Quote-based, varies by services and scope.

Rundit

Quick verdict: Rundit is positioned for VC and PE portfolio monitoring and LP reporting. It highlights interactive LP reports aligned with common guidelines, shareable dashboards (including no-login sharing, vendor-stated), and Excel/PDF exports.

Best for

• VC and PE teams that need structured portfolio monitoring plus LP reporting outputs without rebuilding decks manually each quarter.
• Teams that rely heavily on Excel workflows and want two-way data movement between the reporting platform and spreadsheets.

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• LP report positioning: create LP reports, personalize branding, share as interactive dashboards, export to Excel or PDF.
• Excel add-in: two-way integration to upload and download volumes of data between Excel and Rundit.
• Shareable reporting model includes engagement analytics for stakeholders (vendor-stated).

Pros

• Strong fit when your reporting deliverables are recurring LP packs, dashboards, and exports, especially in VC/PE style operations.
• Excel integration helps reduce “double entry” when Excel is still the working format.

Cons

• If you need accounting-grade statements and strict reconciliations to a general ledger, validate how Rundit integrates with your accounting system of record.
• If no-login sharing is used, validate how confidentiality, permissions, and version control are handled for sensitive investor materials.

Integrations to verify

• Excel integration specifics: mappings, validations, and exception workflows for KPI updates.
• Export formats and template flexibility to match your current LP reporting package structure.

Pricing

• Usually quote-based.

Envestnet (Wealth Management Reporting)

Quick verdict: Envestnet’s reporting is positioned for advisors who need reporting across transactions, holdings, account performance, asset allocation, and capital flows, with an integrated dashboard view inside the Envestnet Wealth Management platform.

Best for

• Wealth management firms that want portfolio reporting as part of a broader wealth management platform.
• Firms using Tamarac-style advisor workflows that need flexible reporting and client portal experiences (depending on configuration).

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• Envestnet reporting page lists reporting on transactions, holdings, account performance, asset allocation, and capital flows, with a unified dashboard view.
• Tamarac reporting overview emphasizes customizable reporting across performance, holdings, transactions, composites, and business intelligence reporting.
• Schwab provider description highlights professional PDF performance reports delivered via an online client portal and document vault, plus billing automation scenarios (for Tamarac Reporting).
• Envestnet release note highlights client portal report features (grouping options and familiar reporting features within the portal).

Pros

• Strong for advisor-centric reporting requirements that include holdings, performance, transactions, and client portal access.
• Customization and BI reporting are explicitly part of the Tamarac reporting positioning.

Cons

• “Envestnet” covers multiple products and configurations. Validate exactly which modules and portal features are included for your operating model.
• If you need private fund LP statement workflows (capital accounts, allocations), you may still need a dedicated fund accounting layer.

Integrations to verify

• Data integrations and how custodian data quality is handled, including reconciliation expectations and exceptions.
• Portal report delivery and whether your preferred pack formats (PDF, portal views) are supported as you expect.

Pricing

• Quote-based.

Orion Advisor Tech

Quick verdict: Orion positions its performance reporting for financial advisors as custom, comprehensive, and accurate, with reports personalized for each investor and customized to your brand. Orion also maintains a client portal experience for ongoing client engagement.

Best for

• Financial advisors who want strong performance reporting output and a consistent client-facing reporting experience.
• Firms standardizing on Orion’s ecosystem, where portal experience and reporting workflows are tightly linked.

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• Orion’s performance reporting page emphasizes personalized reports and customized branding.
• Orion’s portal messaging emphasizes an intuitive client portal experience to support collaboration and client engagement.
• Orion support guidance highlights that understanding performance calculation is important and that Orion explains how it calculates performance (useful for validation and audit readiness).

Pros

• Reporting is designed for advisor-client communication, with branding and personalization emphasized.
• Client portal focus helps reinforce a single “home” for client reporting and engagement.

Cons

• As with all advisor platforms, validate flexibility for non-standard assets and alternative investment reporting if those are core to your book.
• If you are primarily a private fund manager (LP reporting and capital account statements), you may need a fund accounting-focused toolset instead.

Integrations to verify

• How Orion fits your portfolio accounting and data aggregation environment (custodians, data normalization, and exceptions).
• Client portal workflows: permissions, publish controls, and version history.

Pricing

• Quote-based.

Addepar

Quick verdict: Addepar is positioned around advanced analysis and reporting, including drag-and-drop reporting customization, alternatives inclusion, and repeatable report generation into PDFs at scale. It also supports client portal publishing workflows, including API-based publishing and notifications (per developer documentation).

Best for

• Wealth managers, family offices, and institutions that need data aggregation plus flexible reporting outputs.
• Teams that want a strong report builder workflow with reusable templates and portal publishing automation via API.

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• Better Reporting page highlights drag-and-drop customization and analysis/reporting functionality, with alternatives inclusion and custom attributes.
• Addepar blog describes “pixel-perfect custom report templates” as a core value proposition and notes recurring PDF generation for many portfolios, often monthly or quarterly.
• Sample reports page emphasizes customizable reporting across asset classes and currencies, with examples including performance contribution reporting.
• Developer documentation describes a workflow to publish a report or file to Client Portal and notify clients “in a single API call.”

Pros

• Strong for customization-heavy reporting where templates, branding, and scale generation are primary needs.
• API publishing workflows can reduce manual portal administration for recurring report delivery.

Cons 

• Reporting flexibility creates governance requirements. Validate template ownership, approval workflow, and how exceptions are handled when data changes after publishing.
• If you require a fund accounting system of record for partnership allocations and investor statements, you may still need an accounting-focused layer.

Integrations to verify

• Data aggregation coverage and how alternatives data is handled (documents, attributes, and normalization).
• Portal publishing workflow (manual vs API), including version control and notifications.

Pricing

• Quote-based.

SS&C Black Diamond

Quick verdict: SS&C Black Diamond is positioned around impactful, client-ready reporting and a client experience portal. Its reporting page highlights drag-and-drop report building, branded batch or ad hoc reporting, and client-focused portfolio and performance views.

Best for

• Wealth management firms that need polished, customizable client reporting and a modern portal experience.
• Teams that want reporting as a client experience differentiator, not just a compliance output.

Standout capabilities (as positioned)

• Portfolio management and reporting page highlights client-ready reporting with drag-and-drop features and branded batch or ad hoc reports.
• Advisor client experience page describes a “Client Experience Portal” as a digital financial hub.
• Advent solution page references Black Diamond’s “Client Experience” as an intuitive platform for comprehensive wealth views.
• Schwab provider page notes the client experience portal can be customized with firm branding and provides an interactive online view of wealth.

Pros

• Strong reporting polish for client meetings, along with a portal experience designed for ongoing engagement.
• Branded, batch reporting workflows help standardize recurring report production.

Cons

• Validate how the platform handles held-away assets, alternatives, and data normalization if your book is complex.
• Confirm portal publish controls, permissions, and versioning rules, especially if you have strict compliance requirements.

Integrations to verify

• Custodian integration coverage and how data quality issues are surfaced and resolved.
• Portal and report builder workflows: template governance, approvals, and distribution.

Pricing

• Quote-based.

How to choose the right portfolio reporting software

Use this decision path to shortlist fast:

Do reports and statements need to reconcile to accounting books as a system of record?

• Yes: start with FundCount.
• No: go to step 2.

Are you a private fund manager producing LP reporting packages and portal deliverables?

• Yes: shortlist Carta (fund admin + LP portal) and Rundit (portfolio monitoring + LP reporting outputs), then validate your exact report workflow.
• No: go to step 3.

Are you a wealth management or RIA firm producing client performance reports and portal experiences?

• Yes: shortlist Envestnet, Orion, Addepar, and SS&C Black Diamond based on how you want to balance report builder flexibility, portal usability, and integrations.

Is report customization and template scale your main problem?

• If you need highly custom, repeatable report generation at scale: lean toward Addepar or SS&C Black Diamond style report builder workflows.

FAQs

What is portfolio reporting software?

Portfolio reporting software turns portfolio data into repeatable investor or client outputs, such as performance reports, holdings and transaction reporting, and portal-delivered packages.

What is the difference between portfolio reporting software and portfolio management software?

Portfolio management is the operating system for positions, workflows, and decisions. Portfolio reporting is the publishing layer that turns data into deliverables like PDF reports, dashboards, and portal content. In practice, many platforms do both, but buyers should define their “must-have outputs” first.

What is the best portfolio reporting software for private equity and venture capital LP reporting?

If you need accounting-backed investor statements and controlled distribution, start with a system-of-record approach (FundCount). If you need fund administration and an LP Portal experience, Carta is commonly shortlisted. If your need is portfolio monitoring plus LP reports in dashboards and exports, Rundit is positioned directly for that workflow.

What is the best portfolio reporting software for registered investment advisors (RIA) performance reporting?

RIA-style buyers usually prioritize performance reporting, branded PDF packs, and a client portal experience. Envestnet and Orion explicitly position reporting for financial advisors, and FundCount emphasizes client-ready reporting and a client portal experience.

What is the best portfolio reporting software for family offices and private banks?

Family office buyers often need multi-asset reporting, alternatives inclusion, and customization. FundCount positions itself around analysis and reporting, with customization and alternatives inclusion tied to accounting and secure distribution through its portal.

Which portfolio reporting software includes a client portal or investor portal?

Several tools emphasize a portal as part of delivery: FundCount’s Investor Portal, Carta’s LP Portal, Addepar’s Client Portal, Orion’s Client Portal, and Black Diamond’s Client Experience Portal.

Can portfolio reporting software automate quarterly investor reporting packages?

Yes, but “automation” varies. Some platforms focus on batch generation of PDFs and repeatable templates (Addepar explicitly discusses recurring PDF generation at scale). Others focus on portal publishing and controlled delivery (FundCount).

Which portfolio reporting software supports interactive dashboards and Excel exports?

FundCount explicitly positions interactive online dashboards with Excel/PDF exports and an Excel add-in for two-way data movement.

What performance metrics should portfolio performance reporting software support?

It depends on your audience. Private fund LP reporting often includes metrics like DPI, RVPI, and net IRR. Advisor/client reporting often focuses on account performance, holdings, transactions, allocation, and cash flows.

What is the best portfolio reporting software for alternative investments and illiquid assets?

If alternatives inclusion is a primary requirement, validate support for alternative asset data capture and how those assets flow into reports. FundCount explicitly mentions alternatives inclusion in reporting and highlights alternative investment capabilities in wealth contexts (validate based on your exact needs).

Which portfolio reporting software integrates with custodians and data feeds?

If custodian integration is core, verify available feeds, mapping workflows, and exception handling. FundCount explicitly positions direct links with custodians and data providers to reduce data entry and reconciliation errors.

How do portfolio reporting platforms handle data accuracy, reconciliation, and audit trail?

This is platform- and workflow-dependent. Accounting-backed platforms typically emphasize tie-outs and controlled workflows, while analytics/reporting platforms may emphasize data aggregation quality and transparency. In demos, always ask to trace a report number back to its source, then show the version history and approval trail.

How long does the implementation of portfolio reporting software take?

Implementation time depends on data migration, integrations (custodians, accounting, CRM), template build-out, and how many report formats you must support. Your best indicator is the vendor’s ability to demonstrate a realistic end-to-end workflow for your exact reporting cycle.

How much does portfolio reporting software cost?

Pricing is commonly quote-based and depends on the number of portfolios/accounts, reporting complexity, portal users, integrations, and services. For shortlisting, request pricing for your actual reporting volume (batch counts and template counts), not just AUM.

Methodology and disclosures

This list is based on publicly described product positioning and stated capabilities, with emphasis on (1) reporting workflow and template repeatability, (2) delivery model (portal and publishing controls), (3) integrations and automation (custodians, APIs), and (4) governance features that reduce “spreadsheet tax” and version confusion.

Last updated: February 12, 2026