Best Family Office Accounting Software
Family office accounting software is purpose-built to help family offices maintain accurate books across multiple entities, track investments across asset types, and produce reporting packs that hold up under review. It typically combines general ledger workflows with investment and partnership accounting, reconciliations, and controlled reporting distribution.
Key Takeaways
- Multi-entity accounting is the main differentiator. If you have trusts, holding companies, partnerships, and SPVs, prioritize consolidation-friendly structures, audit trail, and close workflows.
- Investment accounting matters as much as GL. The best fit depends on your asset mix, especially private equity, real estate, private credit, and complex derivatives.
- Reconciliations and controls reduce operational risk. Look for clear approvals, period locks, and reliable reconciliation workflows harmonized with custodian or counterparty data.
- FundCount is the most accounting-led option in this list. It is designed to unify multi-currency general ledger, partnership accounting, portfolio accounting, and reporting in one system.
Best for X at a glance
- Best for end-to-end family office accounting (GL + portfolio + partnership + reporting): FundCount
- Best for institutional-grade multi-asset portfolio and fund accounting: SS&C Advent Geneva
- Best for credit and alternatives workflows (process + data + investment accounting orientation): Black Mountain Systems
- Best for a unified front-to-back investment operating model with an accounting book of record: Enfusion
- Best for portfolio accounting and client reporting with relationship-management roots: FundCount
Accounting-first reporting for family offices
Move to a single system for accounting, reporting, and multi-entity rollups with FundCount.
Direct answer
The “best” family office accounting software depends on how complex your entity structure is and how institutional your investment operations need to be.
FundCount is a strong fit when you want a unified multi-currency general ledger plus partnership and portfolio accounting with reporting and an investor portal.
SS&C Advent Geneva is often evaluated when the requirement is multi-asset institutional accounting, investor servicing, and scalability.
Black Mountain Systems (Everest platform heritage) can fit alternatives-heavy operations, especially credit workflows, where process management and investment accounting controls are central.
Enfusion is a front-to-back platform that includes a double-entry general ledger and reconciliations for firms that want a single data set driving operations and reporting.
Quick comparison table
| Software | Best for | Accounting strengths |
| FundCount | Accounting-led family office operations across entities and asset types | Multi-currency, multi-book GL; integrated partnership accounting; portfolio accounting across asset types |
| SS&C Advent Geneva | Institutional portfolio and fund accounting for multi-asset strategies | Portfolio, fund, and investor accounting; general ledger foundation; trade capture and reconciliation orientation |
| Black Mountain Systems | Credit and alternatives workflows that need structured process and investment accounting controls | Investment accounting with transaction validation; workflow and process orientation; alternatives ecosystem |
| Enfusion | Unified operating model with accounting book of record and reconciliations | Double-entry general ledger and ABOR; reconciliation workflows; front-to-back data unification |
| Advent APX | Portfolio accounting and reporting for wealth and family office style reporting | Multi-asset and multi-currency accounting; reporting depth and customization framework; dashboard and portal-style delivery |
*Summary based on publicly available vendor materials and product briefs.
How we evaluated
This is a consideration-intent shortlist. We prioritized capabilities that reduce operational risk in a family office environment: accurate books across entities, reliable investment accounting, strong controls, and repeatable reporting.
Scoring rubric (100 points total):
- Multi-entity general ledger and close workflows: 20
- Investment and portfolio accounting coverage: 20
- Private assets and alternatives support: 15
- Reconciliations and controls (audit trail, approvals, period locks): 15
- Reporting outputs and distribution: 15
- Integrations and data ingestion: 10
- Implementation and support burden: 5
Sources used: vendor websites, product briefs, and publicly available PDFs. We avoid quoting pricing or client counts unless the vendor states them directly.
What to look for in family office accounting software
Use this checklist to avoid buying a tool that looks great in a demo but creates manual work during month-end.
- Multi-entity GL: separate books per entity, plus consolidation and inter-entity visibility where needed
- Multi-currency and multi-book: essential if you operate across jurisdictions or report under different standards
- Investment accounting depth: support for your real asset mix, not just listed securities
- Private markets workflows: capital calls, distributions, valuations, and look-through reporting (where feasible)
- Reconciliations: clear break handling and reliable ingestion from custodians, brokers, or administrators
- Controls and audit trail: approvals, user entitlements, and locked periods
- Reporting packs: repeatable statement templates, plus secure distribution options
- Integrations: data warehouse, trading systems, CRM, and BI tools when required
The 5 best family office accounting software options
FundCount
Best for: Family offices that want an accounting-led platform that unifies general ledger, partnership accounting, portfolio accounting, and reporting in one place.
Why it is a top pick
- Multi-currency, multi-book general ledger designed to support both IFRS and GAAP, reducing the need for multiple accounting cores.
- Portfolio accounting across a wide set of asset types (including private equity, real estate, derivatives, debt, and swaps) for a consolidated view.
- Partnership accounting that replaces spreadsheet allocation workflows for single- and multi-class structures.
- Data aggregation with custodian and data-provider feeds designed to streamline data management and support automated double-entry accounting.
- Reporting and portal delivery so stakeholders can access documents, reports, and dashboards securely.
Accounting strengths
- Multi-currency, multi-book GL supporting IFRS and GAAP.
- General ledger positioned to integrate investment and investor accounting for reporting.
- Partnership accounting designed to eliminate spreadsheet-driven allocations in multi-class structures.
Investment accounting coverage
- Portfolio accounting supports complex investments, including currencies, swaps, derivatives, private equity, real estate, and debt instruments.
- Data aggregation supports feeds from custodians and data providers to reduce manual processes.
Controls and audit trail
- In practice, your control model will come down to permissions, approvals, and period-close governance. FundCount’s publishing and distribution workflows reference secure distribution with approvals and encryption in its reporting workflows.
Reporting
- Family office reporting with standard reports and adaptable templates, positioned as a single source of truth for partnership and portfolio data.
- Ability to share interactive reports online or distribute statements securely with approvals and encryption (positioned in FundCount reporting workflows).
- Investor portal supports two-way encrypted messaging and batch statement delivery, plus dashboard-style access to documents, reports, and tax forms.
Pros
- Strong fit for multi-entity, multi-asset family office accounting that wants one accounting backbone.
- Data aggregation and accounting orientation reduce reliance on manual spreadsheet stitching.
- Portal and reporting distribution built into the broader workflow.
Cons
- As with any integrated platform, successful adoption depends on mapping your entities, chart of accounts, and reporting packs early.
- If your family office has highly institutional trading workflows, you may still need complementary OMS/PMS tooling depending on strategy.
Implementation notes
- Start with an entity map and reporting requirements, then align chart of accounts and dimensions.
- Plan parallel close and reconciliation milestones during onboarding.
- Confirm your data ingestion approach, including custodian feeds and alternative asset statements.
Questions to ask during the demo
- How do you model our entity structure (trusts, holding companies, partnerships, SPVs) and produce consolidated views?
- How does the multi-currency, multi-book GL work in practice for IFRS vs GAAP reporting?
- How do you handle private asset workflows (capital calls, distributions, valuations) and what is automated vs manual?
- What feeds do you support for data aggregation, and what is the reconciliation workflow from custodian data to books?
- Which reporting packs are standard, and how do approvals and encryption work during statement distribution?
- How does the investor portal handle messaging, batch statement delivery, and role-based access?
- What is the recommended approach for historical migration and parallel close?
- What integrations are common in family office stacks (BI tools, CRM, document management), and what is your recommended architecture?
Bottom line
FundCount is best when you want one system to serve as the accounting and reporting backbone across entities and asset types, and you want portfolio and partnership accounting integrated into the general ledger.
SS&C Advent Geneva
Best for: Family offices with institutional requirements for multi-asset portfolio accounting, fund and investor accounting, and scalability across complex structures.
Why it is a top pick
- Geneva is positioned as real-time portfolio management and accounting with investor accounting and reporting.
- It spans front office decision support, trade capture and reconciliation, and portfolio, fund, and investor accounting, which matters when you run an institutional operating model.
- The family office brief explicitly frames Geneva for family offices with diversified portfolios and multi-currency needs.
Accounting strengths
- Built on an “industry-standard general ledger” database in Geneva’s product brief language.
- Designed to ensure integrity and timeliness of accounting data across open and closed periods.
- Portfolio, fund, and investor accounting in the core Geneva description.
Investment accounting coverage
- Broad instrument coverage and multi-currency support are core positioning, including complex derivatives and bank debt in the Geneva product brief.
- The family office brief calls out family office asset diversity (hedge funds, funds of funds, private equity, real estate, hard assets and collectibles) and positions Geneva as a single platform for multi-asset accounting.
Controls and audit trail
- Your control model will depend on how you configure governance, permissions, and period locks. Geneva emphasizes integrity of accounting data across open and closed periods.
Reporting
- Geneva is positioned around real-time P&L, performance, and exposure reporting.
- The family office brief highlights performance reporting needs (IRR and TWR) and look-through transparency as requirements, and positions Geneva for those needs.
Pros
- Strong fit for complex, multi-asset portfolios where investment accounting needs are deep.
- Supports multi-currency trading, accounting, and reporting.
- Tightly positioned around institutional workflows, including trade capture and reconciliation.
Cons
- Generally higher implementation complexity than smaller, accounting-only tools.
- Best outcomes typically require strong internal data governance and clear requirements.
Implementation notes
- Confirm your asset coverage requirements early, including private funds and bespoke investments.
- Map reporting requirements (IRR, TWR, look-through) before you finalize entity and book design.
- If you are considering managed services or outsourced middle/back office support, validate scope and operational responsibilities.
Questions to ask during the demo
- Which of our asset classes require special configuration, and what does “broad asset class coverage” mean for our portfolio?
- How do you handle multi-currency entities and tiered fund structures in our environment?
- What is the reconciliation workflow, and what data sources are supported (custodians, counterparties, administrators)?
- How do open vs closed periods work, and how do you lock accounting periods for control?
- What investor accounting or servicing capabilities are included, and how are they integrated with portfolio accounting?
- How do you generate and validate IRR/TWR and look-through reporting outputs?
- What integrations are typical (risk, data warehousing, trading), and what is required vs optional?
- What does implementation look like, including staffing needs and timeline assumptions?
Bottom line
Advent Geneva is often evaluated when a family office wants institutional-grade portfolio and investor accounting with strong multi-asset and multi-currency foundations.
Black Mountain Systems
Best for: Alternatives-heavy or credit-oriented family office operations that need structured workflow, data aggregation and process management, and investment accounting controls aligned to private capital operations.
Why it is a top pick
- Black Mountain Systems developed solutions for data aggregation, process management, and business reporting, and its Everest platform is associated with operational efficiency and risk reduction for credit and alternatives managers.
- In the Allvue ecosystem, investment accounting is positioned as transaction-validated accounting, built for scalability and integration with front office credit solutions.
- This category can be relevant for family offices that operate like institutional alternatives managers, especially in private credit.
Accounting strengths
- Allvue’s investment accounting positioning emphasizes accounting checks and validation on every transaction.
- Browser-based investment accounting is positioned for deployment and integration with other systems.
- Workflow orientation for credit and alternatives managers (Everest platform) is positioned around efficiency and risk reduction.
Investment accounting coverage
- Allvue describes investment accounting that integrates with credit solutions and third-party systems.
- Credit markets solutions explicitly reference investment accounting as part of the workflow unification across the deal lifecycle.
Controls and audit trail
- Expect to validate controls by product module: transaction validation, approvals, and close controls. The investment accounting positioning explicitly emphasizes validation and risk mitigation.
Reporting
- Black Mountain Systems is described as having tailored solutions for business reporting, and the ecosystem positioning includes reporting and investor communications depending on module scope.
Pros
- Strong alignment for credit and alternatives operating models where workflow and process management are central.
- Investment accounting messaging emphasizes transaction validation and integrated workflows.
- Often evaluated as part of a broader private capital operations suite under Allvue.
Cons
- Not every family office needs an alternatives manager style operating platform.
- You should confirm what is included in your specific packaging and what requires additional modules.
Implementation notes
- Start by defining the operating model (credit platform needs vs entity accounting needs).
- Validate how investment accounting outputs will connect to your family office general ledger and reporting packs.
- Confirm data integration expectations and ownership of reconciliation steps.
Questions to ask during the demo
- Which workflows are strongest for our strategies (direct lending, private credit, alternatives), and where are the boundaries?
- What does “accounting checks and validation on every transaction” mean operationally, and how are exceptions handled?
- How do you reconcile positions and cash across sources, and what feeds are supported?
- How do you support carried interest or waterfall calculations if relevant to our structures?
- How does investment accounting integrate with our management company accounting or an external GL?
- What reporting outputs are standard, and how do you deliver reporting to stakeholders?
- What is the implementation approach, and what internal resources do we need?
- What is the roadmap for your specific product lineage (Black Mountain, Everest platform heritage, Allvue modules)?
Bottom line
Black Mountain Systems (via its Everest platform heritage under Allvue) can make sense for family offices running alternatives-heavy strategies that require strong workflow discipline and investment accounting controls.
Enfusion
Best for: Family offices or family investment firms that want a unified operating model where portfolio workflows, reconciliations, and an accounting book of record are driven from a single data set.
Why it is a top pick
- Enfusion positions its double-entry general ledger as producing automated postings of debits and credits for securities and cash events, maintaining a complete set of books and records (ABOR).
- It highlights reconciliation functionality that monitors trades, positions, and cash balances across counterparties with automated data collection.
- A public Enfusion client story describes General Ledger functionality capturing daily P&L and supporting end-of-month NAV reporting, and feeding data to an accounting platform of record.
Accounting strengths
- Proper double-entry general ledger with automated debits and credits and financial statements, positioned as an ABOR.
- Supports reporting access across business units with real-time and historical views (as positioned in its brochure).
Investment accounting coverage
- Enfusion’s platform messaging connects portfolio management to accounting outputs using a shared data set.
- If you need an “operating system” that ties investment workflows to accounting and reporting, it is commonly evaluated in that context.
Controls and audit trail
- Controls typically live in how workflows enforce approvals, compliance checks, and period controls. The brochure describes pre-trade and post-trade monitoring and rule sets, which may matter depending on operating model.
Reporting
- Brochure positioning emphasizes analytics and reporting with real-time data access and automated reporting.
- The client story notes generating simplified versions of reports for clients upon request.
Pros
- Good fit when you want reconciliation, reporting, and accounting aligned to the same operational data set.
- ABOR-style accounting positioning can reduce manual postings and break chasing.
- Strong for firms that also care about front-to-back workflow integration, not only month-end accounting.
Cons
- Often overkill if you mainly need multi-entity general ledger and basic reporting.
- Implementation can be heavier if you are aligning multiple teams and workflows.
Implementation notes
- Map reconciliation sources (custodians, prime brokers, fund administrators) and define break ownership.
- Confirm what your system of record is for accounting, and whether Enfusion will feed another GL or serve as ABOR for your use case.
- Define the reporting artifacts that matter to the family office: NAV-style reporting, entity financials, and stakeholder reporting packs.
Questions to ask during the demo
- What is the exact scope of the general ledger and ABOR in our configuration, and how do you lock periods?
- How does reconciliation work across counterparties, and what data collection is automated vs manual?
- What does month-end NAV reporting look like in practice, and what does it replace in our workflow?
- If we keep a separate accounting platform of record, what is the integration and data handoff model?
- How do you support multi-asset complexity, and where do bespoke investments sit in the data model?
- What reporting and analytics are standard, and what requires managed reporting services or customization?
- What internal resourcing is required for implementation (ops, accounting, IT), and what is the critical path?
- How do you handle audit trail and change management for reporting outputs?
Bottom line
Enfusion is a strong contender when you want portfolio operations, reconciliations, and accounting outputs unified by a single data set, and you are comfortable with a more platform-oriented implementation.
SS&C Advent APX (Advent Portfolio Exchange)
Best for: Family offices and wealth-style investment organizations that prioritize portfolio accounting, reporting depth, multi-currency coverage, and centralized client and relationship data.
Why it is a top pick
- APX is positioned as an integrated portfolio management and client relationship management solution spanning front, middle, and back office on a single platform.
- The APX product brief explicitly mentions use by “asset managers, wealth managers, and family offices.”
- APX emphasizes multi-asset and multi-currency coverage, plus reporting breadth and customization.
Accounting strengths
- Multi-currency accounting is explicitly highlighted in the product brief.
- APX integrates portfolio management, accounting, and reporting (positioned as a single platform).
Investment accounting coverage
- The APX product brief notes it handles equities and fixed income and also references alternatives like private equity.
- It highlights multi-asset class coverage and settlement in any currency.
Controls and audit trail
- The APX product brief references security layers and a patented audit trail, but you should validate how this maps to your governance requirements.
Reporting
- Reporting depth and customization are emphasized, including a library of reports and a reporting framework built around Microsoft Reporting Services in the product brief.
- Web-based reporting options and consolidated interactive reporting via a branded portal are described in the product brief.
- The brief references position reconciliation and multi-custodian reconciliation support.
Pros
- Strong fit when client reporting and portfolio accounting are primary drivers.
- Multi-currency and multi-asset coverage is a core theme.
- Portal-style delivery and interactive reporting options are described in the brief.
Cons
- Depending on your private asset and multi-entity requirements, you may need additional tooling or complementary systems.
- Validation is required for how APX handles bespoke entity accounting beyond portfolio accounting.
Implementation notes
- Define reporting packs and portal expectations early, including brand requirements and delivery cadence.
- Confirm multi-custodian reconciliation needs and how APX ingests and validates custodian data.
- Map relationship data and household structures if you are relying on APX for centralized client and prospect data.
Questions to ask during the demo
- How does APX handle our household and entity structure for reporting and permissions?
- What is included in the reporting library, and how does customization work with Microsoft Reporting Services in practice?
- What reconciliation tools are included, and how do you handle multi-custodian reconciliation and exceptions?
- How do you support alternatives like private equity, and what is the workflow for valuations and statements?
- What are the portal and interactive reporting options, and how are reports delivered to end users?
- What is the deployment model (on-prem vs hosted), and what IT responsibilities remain internal?
- How do security layers and audit trail capabilities map to our governance and audit requirements?
- What does implementation require from our team, especially for data migration and report recreation?
Bottom line
SS&C Advent APX is a strong choice when your priority is portfolio accounting and client reporting with multi-currency and multi-asset coverage, especially in a wealth and family-office style operating model.
Workflow matrix
This simplified matrix helps you sanity-check “fit” before you book demos.
| Capability | FundCount | Advent Geneva | Black Mountain | Enfusion | Advent APX |
| Multi-entity GL focus | Strong | Institutional GL foundation | Varies by module | ABOR oriented | Primarily portfolio and reporting oriented |
| Private assets coverage | Strong across asset types | Broad multi-asset coverage | Strong in credit and alternatives workflows | Platform-driven, validate bespoke assets | Handles alternatives like private equity (validate depth) |
| Reconciliations | Via data aggregation + workflow | Trade capture and reconciliation emphasized | Validate for your sources | Explicit counterparty reconciliation described | Position reconciliation described |
| Reporting packs | Family office reporting templates | Institutional reporting emphasis | Business reporting orientation | Analytics and reporting described | Reporting framework and portal options |
| Portal delivery | Investor portal with encrypted messaging | Varies by configuration | Varies by suite | Depends on configuration | Branded portal reporting options described |
How to choose the right option
Use these decision paths to narrow your shortlist to 2 or 3 demos.
Choose FundCount if
- You want an accounting-first platform that unifies GL + partnership accounting + portfolio accounting + reporting.
- Your pain is spreadsheet allocations, entity sprawl, or inconsistent reporting packs.
Choose Advent Geneva if
- You operate like an institutional manager and need multi-asset accounting at scale with investor accounting and servicing in the same environment.
- You expect complex fund structures, multi-currency, and deep instrument coverage.
Choose Black Mountain Systems if
- Your family office runs credit or alternatives strategies that need workflow discipline and investment accounting controls aligned to private capital operations.
Choose Enfusion if
- You want a unified platform approach with reconciliations and an ABOR-style ledger connected to operations and reporting.
Choose Advent APX if
- Portfolio accounting and client reporting are the priority, especially with multi-currency and multi-asset coverage and a reporting customization framework.
Implementation checklist
- Map entities and ownership structure (trusts, holding companies, partnerships, SPVs)
- Define the chart of accounts and reporting dimensions
- List data sources: custodians, banks, administrators, valuation sources
- Decide historical migration scope and the parallel close approach
- Define reconciliation ownership and break escalation rules
- Create reporting pack requirements: statements, IRR/TWR, look-through, balance sheet, P&L
- Implement permission model, approvals, and period locks
FAQ
What is family office accounting software?
Family office accounting software is a system used to maintain books and records across multiple entities (trusts, partnerships, holding companies), account for investments across asset types, reconcile data sources, and produce repeatable reporting packs. In practice, it sits between “general ledger accounting” and “investment accounting,” with strong controls and reporting requirements.
Can family office accounting software handle private equity and real estate?
Some platforms explicitly position support for private assets and alternatives, while others require more customization or complementary processes. For example, FundCount positions portfolio accounting for private equity, real estate, derivatives, and debt. SS&C Advent’s family office Geneva brief also discusses supporting diversified family office assets, including private equity, real estate, and hard assets.
Do I need both portfolio accounting and a general ledger?
Often, yes. Portfolio accounting tracks holdings, transactions, valuations, and performance. The general ledger supports trial balance, financial statements, and governance controls. SS&C Advent’s family office brief calls out the need for a built-in investment and partnership general ledger to generate a trial balance.
What is “ABOR” and why does it matter?
ABOR stands for accounting book of record. It refers to maintaining a complete set of books and records from which accounting outputs are produced. Enfusion’s materials describe a double-entry general ledger that maintains a complete set of books and records (ABOR).
How long does implementation take?
It depends on the number of entities, the complexity of your assets, and the amount of historical data you migrate. Platform-oriented implementations typically require more governance and reconciliation work. The practical way to reduce risk is to plan a parallel close and reconcile outputs against your current process before switching fully.
What questions should I ask in a demo?
Ask about entity modeling, multi-currency, how private assets are booked, reconciliation workflows, period locks, audit trail, reporting packs, and how data integrates with custodians and other systems. The “demo questions” lists above are designed to be copy-pasted into vendor meetings.
Can these systems replace our reporting platform?
Sometimes. Some tools include strong built-in reporting and portal delivery. FundCount, for example, positions reporting templates and the ability to distribute statements securely, plus an investor portal. Other platforms may require a BI layer or separate report production depending on your needs.
What controls should we expect (audit trail, approvals, locked periods)?
At minimum: user entitlements, audit logs, the ability to lock periods, and a controlled reporting distribution process. Geneva emphasizes accounting integrity across open and closed periods.
FundCount describes distribution workflows with approvals and encryption in its reporting context.
Sources and update policy
Primary sources referenced:
- FundCount product pages: general ledger, portfolio accounting, partnership accounting, reporting, investor portal, and data aggregation.
- SS&C Advent product briefs and pages: Geneva product brief and family office accounting brief; APX product brief and product page.
- Allvue and Black Mountain Systems materials: Allvue’s description of Black Mountain Systems and investment accounting solution positioning.
- Enfusion brochures and public PDFs: Enfusion investment management system brochure and an Enfusion client story PDF.
Update policy: Review this shortlist quarterly or when vendors materially change product packaging, major capabilities, or deployment models.