Landytech’s Sesame One is positioned as an investment management platform for asset owners and family offices, built around multi-asset data aggregation, analytics, reporting, workflow tools, monitoring, collaboration, and security. Landytech also markets Sesame One for family offices that need live portfolio dashboards, performance, exposure, liquidity, risk, forecasts, automated data sourcing, and branded reporting. Its current product page references $100 billion under reporting, 500+ custodians, and 10,000+ open banking feeds.
But “Landytech alternative” searches usually come from family offices that need one or more of the following:
- Accounting-grade reporting, not just portfolio reporting
- General ledger, partnership accounting, entity books, and reconcilable statements
- Stronger multi-entity consolidation across trusts, LLCs, foundations, partnerships, and individuals
- A different balance of client portal, reporting, analytics, and operations
- More direct support for private assets, capital calls, alternative investment statements, and document workflows
- Different pricing posture, especially for offices that do not want AUM-based economics
- A broader family office operating platform that includes accounting, tax, bill pay, documents, and workflows
This guide compares 7 Landytech competitors and alternatives across the things family offices actually validate in demos: features, integrations, pros and cons, pricing approach, use cases, implementation effort, and performance considerations. FundCount is listed first because it covers a common “reason to switch” from a reporting-first platform: accounting, reporting, and portal delivery in one workflow.
Key takeaways
- If your “Landytech alternative” requirement is really accounting-grade reporting plus investor portal delivery tied to one system of record, FundCount is the most direct fit in this list. FundCount positions its family office platform around portfolio accounting, partnership accounting, general ledger, alternative investment document intelligence, reporting, investor portal, and data aggregation under one roof.
- If your bottleneck is multi-asset, multi-entity analytics and polished stakeholder reporting, Addepar deserves a top spot on the shortlist. Addepar emphasizes complex ownership structures, multi-asset and multi-currency scenarios, real-time custom reports, alternatives data workflows, and flexible APIs.
- If your world is UHNW total wealth, global entity mapping, direct feeds, and secure visibility, Masttro is a close Landytech-style alternative. Masttro positions itself around aggregating, visualizing, and managing complex portfolios across asset classes, jurisdictions, currencies, and entity structures.
- If you want integrated GL plus performance reporting, Asset Vantage is a strong contender. Asset Vantage describes itself as a family office accounting and reporting platform that combines portfolio oversight, accounting, performance measurement, consolidated reporting, document management, and multi-entity workflows.
- If you want a family office platform built around a core general ledger plus outsourced service optionality, Archway Platform deserves a close look. Archway unifies accounting, investment data aggregation, reporting, partnership accounting, bill payment, client portal delivery, and flexible outsourced services.
- If you want a broad operating platform across entity management, accounting, tax, document management, workflows, and client reporting, Eton Solutions AtlasFive is built for that single-platform ambition.
- If your priority is a European wealth-management suite with reporting, client portals, accounting and tax integration, trading, rebalancing, and white-label client interfaces, QPLIX is a serious alternative.
Quick comparison table
| Platform | Best for | Accounting depth | Portal / reporting strength | Integration posture | Pricing posture |
| FundCount | Reporting and portal delivery tied to the books | High | High | Data aggregation, AppUniverse, exports, implementation-specific integrations | Public SFO starting price |
| Addepar | Analytics-led reporting across complex portfolios | Low to medium | High | Direct feeds, partner ecosystem, APIs | Quote-based |
| Masttro | UHNW total wealth view and entity mapping | Low to medium | High | Direct custodian feeds, data aggregation, secure sharing | Not AUM-based |
| Asset Vantage | Integrated GL plus performance reporting | High | High | Custodian feeds, accounting workflows, document vault, mobile app | Public pricing page, entity-oriented structure |
| Archway Platform | Core GL, reporting, portal, and optional services | High | High | Direct feeds, APIs, platform plus services | Quote-based |
| Eton AtlasFive | End-to-end family office operations | High | Medium to high | Platform plus integrations, AI, workflow ecosystem | Quote-based |
| QPLIX | European wealth-management suite and white-label portal | Medium | High | Bank feeds, accounting exports, client apps, trading and rebalancing | Quote-based |
Note: These categorizations are based on current vendor product positioning and public documentation. Validate accounting depth, portal controls, integrations, pricing, workflow governance, and implementation scope in demos.
A Landytech alternative focused on reporting you can defend
FundCount keeps accounting and reporting aligned so family office outputs stay consistent and explainable.
7 Landytech competitors and alternatives
FundCount: Best for accounting-grade reporting plus investor portal in one workflow
One-line verdict: Choose FundCount when you want family office reporting, performance, accounting, and investor-style delivery anchored to a real accounting system, not a reporting layer that has to reconcile to separate books.
Best for
- Single and multi-family offices that run accounting workflows internally
- Offices where reports must tie back to entity books, GL entries, allocations, and reconciled statements
- Teams managing private equity, real estate, debt, derivatives, partnerships, or nested entities
- Offices that want a portal for statements, documents, and secure communication without moving data into a separate delivery tool
Key capabilities
FundCount’s family office page positions the platform around portfolio accounting, partnership accounting, general ledger, alternative investment document intelligence, reporting, investor portal, and data aggregation. It also says FundCount helps family offices consolidate wealth using a unified general ledger and keep entities, investments, and reports under one roof.
The portfolio accounting layer supports equities, derivatives, private equity, real estate, and debt in the same portfolio view, with performance measures and attribution to explain what drove returns. The partnership accounting layer supports contributions, distributions, series, waterfalls, capital statements, and partnership tax outputs from the same underlying data.
The investor portal sits inside the FundCount ecosystem, so data flows from the accounting engine to investors without manual re-keying. FundCount also highlights personalized bulk statements, structured performance data, encryption, MFA, and single-tenant deployment on private cloud or on-premises.
Integrations
FundCount should be evaluated around your real source systems: custodians, banks, alternative investment statements, PDFs, Excel templates, BI exports, accounting workflows, and portal delivery. In demos, ask to see data move from ingestion to accounting, reporting, and portal publication, not just a static integration list.
Pros
- Strong fit when the real problem is “reports must match the books.”
- Better fit than reporting-only tools if the office needs GL, partnership accounting, allocations, and formal financial statements.
- Built-in portal delivery can reduce manual report distribution and version confusion.
- Public family office pricing gives buyers a clearer starting point than many quote-only competitors.
Pricing approach
FundCount publicly lists Single Family Office pricing starting from $34,099 per year, with digital transformation and hosting fees applying separately.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include entity structures, historical transactions, portfolio and partnership accounting setup, alternative investment document workflows, report templates, portal permissions, and user training.
Performance considerations
Benchmark quarter-end report generation, batch statement production, portal publishing, alternatives document processing, dashboard refresh speed, and audit trail completeness.
Demo questions
- “Show the end-to-end workflow from accounting entries to performance reporting to portal publishing.”
- “Show how multi-entity rollups and look-through reporting work.”
- “Show a private fund statement being processed into accounting and reporting workflows.”
- “Show how a corrected report is reissued without exposing the wrong version.”
- “Show what is native, what is configured, and what requires implementation services.”
One system behind your family office reporting stack
Pair portfolio and aggregation tools with FundCount for accounting-first reporting and multi-entity consolidation.
Addepar: Best for analytics-led reporting across complex portfolios
One-line verdict: Addepar is a strong Landytech alternative when the top priority is portfolio analytics, flexible reporting, multi-asset data aggregation, and stakeholder-ready presentation across complex ownership structures.
Best for
- Family offices that need consolidated reporting across asset classes, entities, and currencies
- Offices prioritizing analytics and stakeholder reports over native accounting
- Teams that want flexible APIs and a large integration ecosystem
- Offices with alternatives workflows that need document collection, processing, and verified data
Key capabilities
Addepar’s family office page says it centralizes financial information in one secure place and provides a complete view of accounts and assets regardless of asset class, legal entity, or currency. It also highlights analysis across complex ownership structures, multi-asset classes, and multi-currency scenarios, plus customized reports that update in real time.
Addepar’s “Why Addepar” page emphasizes aggregation across accounts and institutions, data normalization, automated verification checks, complex portfolio analysis, real-time reporting, and branded report creation.
Its Alts Data Management product automates alternatives document collection, processing, validation, and storage, with workflows built into the Addepar ecosystem across analysis, reporting, and files.
Integrations
Addepar’s integrations page highlights direct data feeds across liquid and illiquid assets, a partner ecosystem, pre-built integrations, and flexible APIs for custom workflows.
Pros
- Strong fit when consolidated analytics and flexible reporting are the main pain points.
- Good option when family members, advisors, and investment teams need different views of the same portfolio.
- Stronger API and integration story than many closed reporting systems.
- Alternatives data workflows can reduce manual PDF handling.
Cons / limitations
- If you need a native family office accounting system of record, validate what is handled in Addepar versus what remains in a separate accounting core.
- Alternatives automation still needs a proof-of-work demo using your real documents and reporting cycle.
Pricing approach
Quote-based. Public product pages reviewed do not show standard list pricing.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include custodian onboarding, entity modeling, data normalization, report design, alternatives workflow setup, user permissions, and custom integration work.
Performance considerations
Benchmark report refresh speed, multi-currency calculations, look-through logic, alternatives document processing, data quality exception handling, and API throughput.
Demo questions
- “Show a consolidated report across a trust, LLC, partnership, and individual.”
- “Show what updates in real time versus on batch.”
- “Show an alternatives document moving into verified reportable data.”
- “Show how family members, advisors, and accountants see different portal views.”
- “Show the API path end to end, not just the integration catalog.”
Masttro: Best for UHNW total wealth visibility and entity mapping
One-line verdict: Masttro is a close Landytech alternative when the buyer wants global wealth aggregation, entity mapping, private asset visibility, secure communication, and a family-facing total wealth view.
Best for
- UHNW families and family offices that want a real-time picture of total wealth
- Offices with global custodians, private assets, collections, real estate, and complex entities
- Teams prioritizing entity mapping and secure visibility
- Buyers who want a pricing model that is not tied to AUM
Key capabilities
Masttro says it aggregates, visualizes, and manages complex portfolios across all asset classes, jurisdictions, currencies, and entity structures. Its family office page describes Masttro as a full-stack family office platform built to consolidate every detail of family wealth into one system.
Masttro’s platform highlights Global Wealth Map, data aggregation, Alternatives AI, portfolio management, and security. Its family office page also references 650+ direct data feeds, alternative investments, daily transactions, and a real-time picture of wealth across all asset classes.
Masttro’s pricing page states that its pricing model is not based on AUM and that the platform tracks every asset class from public equities to private investments and alternatives, with military-grade encryption, Swiss infrastructure, private servers, and 650+ direct data connections.
Integrations
Masttro should be evaluated around direct custodian feeds, alternative investment document processing, entity mapping, cash and liquidity tracking, mobile access, and secure stakeholder communication.
Pros
- Strong fit for total wealth visibility across global assets and entity structures.
- Useful when the family wants intuitive entity mapping and family-facing dashboards.
- Pricing not tied to AUM can be attractive for large families.
- Strong security and privacy positioning.
Cons / limitations
- Validate accounting depth if your office needs full GL, entity books, financial statements, and reconciled accounting outputs inside the same system.
- Private asset automation and AI workflows should be tested with your own statements, capital calls, and valuation documents.
Pricing approach
Contact vendor. Masttro publicly states that pricing is not based on AUM.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include custodian connectivity, entity mapping, alternative asset setup, document workflow configuration, user permissions, and stakeholder portal design.
Performance considerations
Benchmark dashboard load times, daily feed refreshes, private asset updates, mobile experience, entity map responsiveness, and secure report sharing.
Demo questions
- “Show the full wealth map across trusts, LLCs, foundations, and individuals.”
- “Show two custodian feeds, one private fund, and one direct investment in the same dashboard.”
- “Show what is real time, what is daily, and what requires manual review.”
- “Show family member, trustee, advisor, and accountant permissions.”
- “Show how reports and documents are shared securely.”
Asset Vantage: Best for integrated GL plus performance reporting
One-line verdict: Asset Vantage is a strong Landytech alternative when the office wants performance reporting, accounting, document management, and multi-entity oversight in one family-office-specific system.
Best for
- Family offices that need accounting and performance reporting together
- Offices with multiple entities, advisors, and private investments
- Teams that want consolidated net worth, portfolio performance, document vault, and role-based access
- Buyers that prefer pricing tied to entities rather than AUM
Key capabilities
Asset Vantage says it is a family office accounting and reporting platform designed to offer real-time information about wealth. It also says it consolidates investment data, manages accounting, and stores documents on one platform.
The platform supports a wide range of entities, including individuals, companies, trusts, partnerships, estates, LLCs, and foundations, and can track personal assets such as homes, planes, cars, insurance policies, and collectibles. Asset Vantage also describes itself as a portfolio management platform anchored in a single general ledger, combining portfolio oversight, accounting, performance measurement, and consolidated reporting.
Its pricing page states “No hidden fees. No AUM-based pricing” and shows packages for performance reporting, automated accounting and performance reporting, and future AI-powered insights. It also lists features such as configurable dashboards, auto import and posting, look-through, consolidated and multi-period reporting, integrated accounting, multi-entity group reporting, document vault, audit trail, API integrations, SSO, and two-factor authentication.
Integrations
Validate custodian and bank feeds, accounting outputs, Tally or other accounting exports if relevant, document workflows, mobile access, API integrations, and role-based advisor access.
Pros
- Strong fit when family office reporting must stay aligned with accounting records.
- Clear multi-entity and document-management story.
- Useful for offices that need personal assets and liabilities inside net worth reporting.
- Public pricing page gives more transparency than many competitors.
Cons / limitations
- Validate geographic fit, accounting standards, tax workflows, and support coverage for your jurisdiction.
- If your main need is a polished client reporting portal without accounting depth, AV may be more accounting-heavy than required.
Pricing approach
Asset Vantage publishes pricing information and states that pricing is not AUM-based. Its pricing page shows annual INR pricing for certain packages and entity-based options.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include entity setup, chart of accounts, custodian integrations, document vault migration, private asset workflows, stakeholder access, and data conversion.
Performance considerations
Benchmark consolidated reporting, entity-level drill-down, document retrieval, mobile dashboards, audit trail review, and accounting close workflows.
Demo questions
- “Show a consolidated net worth report and drill back to entity-level sources.”
- “Show how GL, performance reporting, and documents stay connected.”
- “Show private investment commitments, valuations, and documents.”
- “Show role-based access for family members and advisors.”
- “Explain pricing using our actual entity map.”
Archway Platform: Best for GL-backed reporting plus optional outsourced services
One-line verdict: Archway is a strong Landytech alternative when the office wants a core general ledger, investment data aggregation, reporting, client portal delivery, bill pay, partnership accounting, and the option to outsource back-office workflows.
Best for
- Single and multi-family offices with complex accounting and reporting operations
- Offices that want platform plus services flexibility
- Teams that need 200+ report templates and automated report packages
- Families that want a mobile client portal connected to accounting and reporting
Key capabilities
Archway says its platform is trusted by more than 400 wealthy families and helps single and multi-family offices streamline accounting, investment, and reporting operations. It covers partnership accounting, bill payment, financial data aggregation, client reporting, and total wealth reporting in one family office software solution.
Archway highlights direct data integrations with custodians, brokers, banks, and data sources, plus flexible APIs. It supports master-feeder, fund-of-funds, and nested entity structures, and consolidates data across entities, asset classes, custodians, managers, currencies, and geographies.
Its reporting library includes 200+ report templates across financial statements, asset allocation, investment activity, performance, and risk. Archway also supports automated recurring and ad hoc report packages, performance reporting using time-weighted or money-weighted returns, and a mobile client portal for dashboards, data views, and secure document sharing.
Integrations
Validate direct feed coverage, API needs, client portal permissions, document management, bill pay, partnership administration, accounting close workflows, and outsourced service boundaries.
Pros
- Strong fit for family offices that need accounting depth plus reporting maturity.
- Optional outsourced services can help lean teams scale.
- Good portal and report-pack workflow for family members and advisors.
- Strong nested-entity and partnership accounting positioning.
Cons / limitations
- Implementation can be larger than a reporting-only rollout.
- Buyers should clarify which workflows are software-only, service-assisted, or fully outsourced.
- Public product pages do not show list pricing.
Pricing approach
Quote-based. Pricing depends on platform scope, data complexity, and service model.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include GL setup, historical data, investment data integrations, report package design, portal configuration, bill pay workflows, and service scoping.
Performance considerations
Benchmark close workflows, recurring report package production, multi-entity consolidation, portal delivery, and outsourced service turnaround times.
Demo questions
- “Show one month-end close across multiple entities.”
- “Show a recurring family report package and an ad hoc report.”
- “Show the client portal on desktop and mobile.”
- “Show bill pay approvals and accounting entries.”
- “Show where software ends and services begin.”
Eton Solutions AtlasFive: Best for end-to-end family office operations
One-line verdict: Eton AtlasFive is a strong Landytech alternative when the family office wants a broad operating platform, not just an aggregation and reporting tool.
Best for
- Complex single and multi-family offices that want one operating platform
- Teams that need entity management, accounting, tax, bill pay, document workflows, and audit trails
- Offices that want integrated data governance and AI-supported workflows
- Larger organizations that want to standardize operations across teams and regions
Key capabilities
Eton Solutions says AtlasFive integrates entity management, portfolio management, general ledger and fund accounting, transaction processing, document management, and more into a unified digital ecosystem. The platform is used by single family offices, multi-family offices, wealth owners, RIAs, business managers, and private equity firms, and Eton says it manages over $1.3 trillion in assets.
AtlasFive is positioned around a single source of truth across investment, accounting, and tax data. Eton also says AtlasFive manages 270+ workflows across investment management, accounting, tax, document management, bill pay, transaction processing, fund accounting, and trust accounting.
Its core accounting capabilities include integrated GL, trust accounting, partnership accounting, tax ledger, automated data feed processing, automated journal entry creation, daily bank and book reconciliation, and financial statement reports with transaction-level drill-down. Its cybersecurity section references ISO 42001, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and CCPA.
Integrations
Validate data feed processing, tax systems, accounting workflows, document workflows, bill pay, client reporting, entity management, audit trail, and migration from legacy systems.
Pros
- Strong fit for offices that want an operating system rather than a reporting layer.
- Deep workflow coverage across accounting, tax, documents, bill pay, and entities.
- Strong governance and audit trail story.
- Useful for large or complex offices that want standardization.
Cons / limitations
- Broad platform scope requires careful implementation planning.
- May be too much platform if the office only needs reporting and dashboards.
- Buyers should validate module depth versus best-of-breed alternatives.
Pricing approach
Quote-based. Public pages reviewed do not list standard package pricing.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include process mapping, workflow configuration, entity migration, document migration, accounting and tax data setup, bill pay design, and organizational adoption.
Performance considerations
Benchmark transaction processing, automated reconciliations, report production, workflow approvals, data access by role, and audit trail retrieval.
Demo questions
- “Show transaction ingestion, journal entry creation, reconciliation, and reporting in one flow.”
- “Show entity management and ownership relationships.”
- “Show trust and partnership accounting.”
- “Show workflow approvals and audit trails.”
- “Show what is native versus configured.”
QPLIX: Best for a European wealth-management suite with reporting, portal, and workflow depth
One-line verdict: QPLIX is a strong Landytech alternative when a family office or wealth manager wants a European platform that blends reporting, analytics, accounting and tax integration, client portal, app, trading, rebalancing, and compliance tools.
Best for
- European family offices and wealth managers
- Offices that want reporting, analytics, portal, and rebalancing in one suite
- Teams that need multilingual and multicurrency reporting
- Firms that want white-label client portals and mobile apps
Key capabilities
QPLIX says it originated from family office expertise and is built for wealth management across all asset classes. Its software overview positions QPLIX as a single source of truth that unites accounting and tax, AI features, client interfaces, reporting and analytics, trading, and rebalancing.
QPLIX’s reporting and analytics page highlights near-real-time asset information in multiple languages and currencies, customizable reporting, ad hoc analysis, risk analysis, compliance reports, and automated investment guideline or threshold reporting.
Its client portal and app page describes mobile and desktop access, white-label solutions, real-time portfolio updates, financial insights, critical reports, role management, document sharing, and configurable end-user portals.
Integrations
Validate bank and market data feeds, accounting exports, trading and rebalancing connectivity, client portal requirements, data residency expectations, mobile app branding, and compliance workflows.
Pros
- Strong fit for European wealth managers and family offices.
- Good balance of reporting, client portal, analytics, trading, and accounting-adjacent workflows.
- White-label portal and app capabilities can be attractive for multi-family offices.
- Multilingual and multicurrency reporting is useful for cross-border families.
Cons / limitations
- Validate accounting depth if you need full entity books, partnership accounting, and formal financial statements.
- US-focused family offices should validate tax, accounting, custodian, and support coverage carefully.
- Public pages reviewed do not show list pricing.
Pricing approach
Quote-based. Pricing should be scoped against users, modules, portal needs, integrations, and data complexity.
Implementation and TCO notes
Biggest effort drivers include portfolio data migration, bank and custodian feeds, client portal branding, reporting presets, accounting exports, rebalancing workflows, and permission setup.
Performance considerations
Benchmark near-real-time reporting, portal load time, mobile access, report generation, compliance threshold alerts, trading workflow controls, and accounting exports.
Demo questions
- “Show reporting across entities, asset classes, languages, and currencies.”
- “Show the client portal and app with our branding.”
- “Show role management for beneficial owners and advisors.”
- “Show accounting and tax export workflows.”
- “Show trading and rebalancing controls.”
Where Landytech still fits
Landytech remains a strong option when the family office wants a modern data aggregation, analytics, and reporting command center for multi-asset portfolios. Sesame One is positioned around resolving data aggregation, analytical, and reporting challenges, with workflow tools for complete portfolio control. Its family office page highlights live dashboards, insights into performance, exposure, liquidity, risk and forecasts, automated data sourcing, centralized tasks, notes, documents, notifications, mobile access, and operational efficiency.
Landytech also has a strong reporting story. Its Reporting Builder is described as a tool for building, scheduling, and distributing reports natively connected to Sesame data and analytics, with drag-and-drop functionality, branding controls, report center, scheduling, dashboard links, email delivery, mobile app sharing, and Sesame Grid for modeling and portfolio analysis.
Staying with Landytech may make sense if:
- Your main pain is investment reporting, dashboards, and data consolidation.
- You want branded reports and a modern client experience.
- You do not need a native family office GL as the core system of record.
- Your accounting workflow can stay in another system, possibly connected through Sesame Data or partner integrations.
- Your team values analytics and reporting flexibility over accounting depth.
Switching or shortlisting alternatives may make sense if:
- Your reports must reconcile directly to entity books and financial statements.
- You need partnership accounting, trust accounting, waterfall-style allocations, or formal capital accounting.
- You want accounting, reporting, and portal delivery in one workflow.
- You need deeper support for multi-entity accounting controls, audit trails, and close processes.
- You need a different pricing model or regional support model.
How to choose: decision tree
- If reports must reconcile to accounting records and you want portal publishing from the same workflow, start with FundCount.
- If your top pain is analytics, flexible reporting, custom dashboards, alternatives workflows, and APIs, shortlist Addepar.
- If your priority is UHNW total wealth visibility, entity mapping, global assets, and non-AUM pricing, shortlist Masttro.
- If you want GL plus performance reporting, document management, and multi-entity accounting in one platform, shortlist Asset Vantage.
- If you want a GL-backed family office platform with report templates, bill pay, client portal, and optional outsourced services, shortlist Archway.
- If you want a full operating platform for entity management, accounting, tax, workflows, document management, bill pay, and audit trail, shortlist Eton AtlasFive.
- If you want a European wealth suite with reporting, portal, app, trading, rebalancing, accounting exports, and white-label client interfaces, shortlist QPLIX.
FAQs
What is Landytech used for?
Landytech’s Sesame One is used for multi-asset portfolio data aggregation, analytics, reporting, monitoring, workflow tools, and collaboration. Its family office page positions Sesame One as a platform for resolving data aggregation, analytical, and reporting challenges for family offices with multi-asset portfolios.
What is the best Landytech alternative for family offices?
The best alternative depends on the source of truth you need. FundCount is the strongest starting point if reporting must tie to accounting, GL, partnership mechanics, and portal publishing. Addepar is stronger for analytics-led reporting. Masttro is strong for total wealth visibility and entity mapping. Asset Vantage, Archway, and Eton are stronger when accounting and operations matter more than dashboards alone.
Which Landytech competitor is best for accounting-grade reporting?
FundCount is the clearest fit in this shortlist because it combines portfolio accounting, partnership accounting, general ledger, reporting, investor portal, and data aggregation in one family office ecosystem.
Which Landytech alternative is best for analytics and custom reporting?
Addepar and Landytech are closest in the analytics-led reporting category. Addepar emphasizes complex ownership structures, multi-asset and multi-currency analysis, real-time customized reports, alternatives document workflows, and flexible APIs.
Which Landytech alternative is best for total wealth visibility?
Masttro is a strong fit for total wealth visibility. Its official pages position the platform around aggregating, visualizing, and managing complex portfolios across asset classes, jurisdictions, currencies, and entity structures, with Global Wealth Map, data aggregation, Alternatives AI, portfolio management, and security as core areas.
Which Landytech alternative is best for integrated GL and performance reporting?
FundCount is a strong fit if you want a platform anchored in a single general ledger with portfolio oversight, accounting, performance measurement, consolidated reporting, document management, and multi-entity support.
Which Landytech alternative is best for family offices that want outsourced support?
Archway is a strong option because it pairs family office software with outsourced services for reconciliation, reporting, bill pay, and back-office operations.
Which Landytech alternative is best for an end-to-end family office operating platform?
FundCount is the strongest fit in this shortlist for broad operating workflows. It combines entity management, portfolio management, GL and fund accounting, transaction processing, document management, tax, bill pay, workflows, audit trails, AI, cybersecurity, and cloud-native architecture.
What should vendors show in a live demo?
Use a repeatable script: ingest one custodian feed, process one private investment document, show entity ownership mapping, produce a consolidated report, drill into one number, publish the report securely, then show permissions, approvals, audit trail, and corrected-report handling. That separates a true family office operating platform from a polished reporting layer.
Methodology and last updated
How we selected the 7
This list focuses on platforms commonly evaluated by family offices when comparing Landytech against alternatives. Some are accounting-first systems. Some are analytics-first reporting platforms. Some are total wealth visibility tools. Others are broader operating platforms with workflows across accounting, tax, bill pay, documents, entity management, and client delivery.
Evaluation criteria
- Accounting depth and GL support
- Portfolio, partnership, trust, and entity accounting capabilities
- Multi-entity consolidation and ownership look-through
- Reporting, dashboards, and client portal delivery
- Data aggregation and alternatives document workflows
- Security, permissions, approvals, and audit trails
- Integrations, APIs, exports, and ecosystem fit
- Pricing transparency where available
- Implementation complexity and total cost of ownership
- Fit for single and multi-family offices
Sources
We used current public product, pricing, family office, reporting, portal, integration, and platform pages from Landytech, FundCount, Addepar, Masttro, Asset Vantage, Archway, Eton Solutions, and QPLIX. The article structure, tone, and sectioning were modeled on the attached alternatives article.
Last updated: April 28, 2026.
